Sexual activity with detained persons.
Summary
Existing law makes it a crime for certain persons, including an employee or officer of a public entity detention facility, or an employee, officer, or agent of a private person or entity that provides a detention facility or staff for a detention facility, or a person or agent of a public or private entity detention facility, to engage in sexual activity with a consenting adult who is confined in a detention facility. For purposes of those provisions, "detention facility" includes a vehicle used to transport a person during a person's period of confinement. This bill would make those provisions applicable to peace officers, and would specify that transport of a person during confinement also includes transporting a person after he or she has been arrested but has not been booked. By expanding the scope of a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jul 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Jul 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Jul 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jul 2, 2012 · Assembly Apr 26, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Jul 2, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
9
Jul 13, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 2, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Jul 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 12, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-5)
assembly
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 18).
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2078
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2078. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline