Courts: electronic filing and service of documents.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a trial court to adopt local rules permitting electronic filing and service of documents, subject to rules adopted by the Judicial Council and other specified conditions. Existing law also authorizes the court, in any action in which a party has agreed to accept electronic service, or in which the court has ordered electronic service, as specified, to electronically serve any document issued by the court that is not required to be personally served, in the same manner that parties electronically serve documents. This bill would authorize the Orange County Superior Court, until July 1, 2014, to establish a pilot project to require parties to eligible civil actions, as specified, to electronically file and serve documents, subject to rules adopted by the Judicial Council and other specified conditions. The bill would require the Judicial Council to conduct an evaluation of any pilot project established pursuant to that provision and report to the Legislature on or before December 31, 2013, on the results of the evaluation. The bill would also require the Judicial Council to adopt uniform rules to permit mandatory electronic filing and service of documents in eligible civil actions on or before July 1, 2014. The bill would authorize a superior court to require mandatory electronic filing, as specified, upon the adoption of those uniform rules by the Judicial Council.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 14, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2012 · Assembly Aug 27, 2012
How they voted
28–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Aug 22, 2012
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
10
Committee
8
Amendments
4
Sep 14, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6312.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (28-0-3)
senate
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 1, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JS
Jim Silva
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2073
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2073. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline