School attendance: residency requirements.
Summary
Existing law requires each person between 6 and 18 years of age not otherwise exempted to attend the public full-time day school or continuation school or classes in the school district where the person's parent or legal guardian is located. Existing law provides various exceptions to this residency requirement, including, but not limited to, authorizing a pupil to attend school in a school district in which his or her parent or legal guardian is employed. This bill would require a school district to accept a wide range of documents and representations from the parent or legal guardian of a pupil living with his or her parent or legal guardian as reasonable evidence that the pupil meets those residency requirements, including, but not limited to, property tax payment receipts, rental property contract, lease, or payment receipts, utility service contract, statement, or payment receipts, pay stubs, voter registration, correspondence from a government agency, or a declaration of residency executed by the parent or legal guardian of a pupil. The bill would, if an employee of a school district reasonably believes that the parent or legal guardian of a pupil has provided false or unreliable evidence of residency, authorize the school district to make reasonable efforts to determine that the pupil actually meets the residency requirements. The bill would specify that it not be construed as limiting access to pupil enrollment in a school district as otherwise provided by state and federal statutes and regulations. Existing law provides that any school district that is adjacent to an international border may accept a wide range of documents and representations from the parent or guardian of a pupil for purposes of establishing residency in a school district, as specified. Existing law requires those school districts to make reasonable efforts to determine whether a pupil meets the residency requirements if any employee of such a school district reasonably believes that the parent or guardian of the pupil has provided false or unreliable evidence of residency. This bill would repeal these provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Jan 31, 2011
Signed Oct 3, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 25, 2011
How they voted
41–22
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 69
Apr 25, 2011
D
Democratic44
93% Yea
R
Republican25
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Oct 3, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 29. Page 2650.).
lower
Aug 22, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 2.) (June 15).
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-22-6)
assembly
Mar 31, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 30).
lower
Feb 10, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 1, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 207
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 207. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline