Ex parte communications.
Summary
Under existing law, the Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, the State Water Resources Control Board and the 9 California regional water quality control boards are the principal state agencies with responsibility for the coordination and control of water quality in the state. The act requires the state board to formulate and adopt state policies for water quality control, and authorizes the state board to hold any hearings and conduct any investigations in any part of the state necessary to carry out the powers vested in the state board, as specified. The act also requires the regional boards to adopt regional water quality control plans in compliance with the state policies. Existing law requires each regional board to conduct certain proceedings, including, but not limited to, holding at least 6 regular meetings each calendar year. Existing law, the Administrative Procedure Act, provides for the conduct of administrative adjudication proceedings of state agencies. Existing law generally prohibits ex parte communication including communication during a pending proceeding, regarding any issue in the proceeding, to the presiding officer by an employee or representative of an agency that is a party to the proceeding without notice and opportunity for all parties to participate, except as specified. This bill would prohibit a state board member, a regional board member, or any interested person, as defined, from engaging in a communication that would be considered ex parte under the Administrative Procedure Act. The bill would provide that a communication is not ex parte if the communication is between a state or regional board staff member acting in his or her official capacity and a state board member, regional board member, or any interested person. The bill would provide that an otherwise prohibited ex parte communication is permissible if the state or regional board member fully discloses the communication, and the communication is in regard to waste discharge requirements, water quality certifications, or conditional waivers of waste discharge requirements, as specified. The bill would also provide that an otherwise prohibited ex parte communication is permissible if a regional board member fully discloses the communication, and the communication is in regard to a municipal separate storm sewer permit, as defined.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
May 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Jul 2, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 21, 2012
How they voted
57–7
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 72
May 21, 2012
D
Democratic45
68% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican26
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
4
Committee
6
Amendments
1
May 31, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
May 21, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-7-8)
assembly
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 15. Noes 1.) (May 16).
lower
May 1, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 1.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2063
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2063. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline