Juveniles: educational decisions.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the court to limit the right of a parent to make educational decisions for a dependent child or ward of the court under specific circumstances. If the court limits a parent's right to make educational decisions for his or her child, existing law authorizes the court to temporarily appoint a responsible adult to make educational decisions for the child. Under existing law, if the court cannot identify a responsible adult to fulfill that role while dependency proceedings are pending, the court may make educational decisions for the child, except as specified. After a child has been adjudged a dependent child or a ward of the juvenile court, if the court cannot identify a responsible adult to make educational decisions for the child, the court is required to refer the child to the local educational agency for appointment of a surrogate parent if the child has special education needs. If appointment of a surrogate parent is not warranted because the child does not have special education needs, and the child does not have a foster parent, the court may make educational decisions for the child. This bill would require the court, after limiting a parent's educational rights in dependency or wardship proceedings, to determine if there is a responsible adult who is a relative, nonrelative extended family member, or other adult known to the child and who is available and willing to serve as the child's educational representative before appointing an educational representative or surrogate who is not known to the child. This bill would also require an appointed educational representative or surrogate parent to meet with the child, investigate the child's educational needs and whether those needs are being met, and present recommendations to the court or attend court to participate in any portion of a hearing that concerns the child's education. By requiring a higher level of service by local educational agencies in the appointment and performance of surrogate parents, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Aug 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Aug 17, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2012 · Assembly Aug 13, 2012
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Aug 9, 2012
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
31
Key actions
9
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Aug 17, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (78-0-1)
assembly
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5890.).
lower
Aug 9, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
Aug 9, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 6, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jul 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 20, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 19). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 16).
lower
May 1, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2060
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2060. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline