Contempt of court: domestic violence.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a court to punish for acts of contempt, including authorizing a court to direct the incarceration of a defendant until he or she complies with the court's order. Existing law prohibits a court from imprisoning or otherwise taking into custody the victim of a sexual assault or domestic violence crime for contempt of court when the contempt consists of refusing to testify about the sexual assault or domestic violence crime. Additionally, under existing law, a victim of domestic violence has a privilege to refuse to disclose, and to prevent another from disclosing, confidential communications between the victim and a domestic violence counselor, as specified. This bill would authorize the court to refer a victim of a domestic violence crime who refuses to testify to a domestic violence counselor, as defined, before finding the victim in contempt of court. Under the bill, any communications between the victim and the domestic violence counselor would remain confidential, subject to certain exceptions. Existing law provides that an order terminating a criminal action is a bar to further prosecution for the same offense, as specified. This bar to subsequent prosecution does not apply in certain circumstances, including if the court makes certain specified findings after the dismissal of the action. These findings include that the termination of the action was the result of the failure to appear by the complaining witness, who had been personally subpoenaed in a prosecution for misdemeanor battery, felony rape, felony corporal injury, or a felony or misdemeanor violation of a court order to prevent domestic violence. This bill would provide that an order terminating an action does not bar further prosecution for the same offense if the termination of the action was the result of the complaining witness being found in contempt of court for refusing to testify about the sexual assault or domestic violence crime. This provision would apply only within 6 months of the original dismissal of the action, and could be invoked only once in each action.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Signed Sep 24, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 13, 2012 · Assembly May 21, 2012
How they voted
33–3
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 39
Aug 13, 2012
D
Democratic24
79% Yea
R
Republican15
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
6
Amendments
1
Sep 24, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-3-3)
senate
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 12, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 12).
upper
May 31, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 21, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (75-0-4)
assembly
May 15, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 8).
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2051
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2051. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline