Education finance: revenue limits.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to determine a revenue limit for each school district in the county by, in part, calculating a base revenue limit for a fiscal year by adding a specified inflation adjustment, specified equalization adjustment, and specified add-ons to the base revenue limit for the prior fiscal year. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to compute an add-on for each school district by adding a specified inflation adjustment to the amount of the add-on computed in the 2010–11 fiscal year, which is based, in part, on a specified adjustment. This bill would instead require the Superintendent, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to compute the add-on for each school district in a different manner by, among other things, multiplying the sum of 1.0 plus the percentage change determined pursuant to a specified provision. (2) Existing law requires the Superintendent, for the 2010–11 fiscal year, to compute an adjustment for each school district by dividing each school district's 2007–08 fiscal year average daily attendance into the sum of funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs and funding for incentives to increase beginning teachers' salaries received by the school district for the 2007–08 fiscal year pursuant to specified provisions. This bill would instead require the Superintendent, for the 2014–15 fiscal year, to compute an adjustment for each school district by dividing each school district's 2009–10 fiscal year average daily attendance into funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs received by the school district for the 2009–10 fiscal year. (3) A former provision, which became inoperative on July 1, 2010, and was repealed on January 1, 2011, authorized an adjustment of the revenue limit of a school district to reflect funding for Meals for Needy Pupils programs. This bill would reenact this authorization, which would be operative until July 1, 2014.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action May 25, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
2
Committee
6
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 1.) (March 28). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 15, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 2008
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 2008. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline