Vehicles: towing and impoundment: unlicensed drivers.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes a peace officer to impound for 30 days a vehicle driven by a person who had never been issued a driver's license. Existing law subjects to forfeiture, and requires the impoundment of, a vehicle driven by an unlicensed driver who is a registered owner of the vehicle and who has a previous misdemeanor conviction of operating a vehicle without a driver's license. This bill would prohibit a peace officer from towing and impounding, or causing the towing and impoundment of, a vehicle driven by a person who does not have a valid driver's license, as specified, if the vehicle is, or could be, legally parked at a location near the scene of the traffic stop or if control of the vehicle is, or could be, relinquished to a licensed driver. If a licensed driver is not present at the time of the traffic stop, the bill would require the peace officer to inform the driver that the vehicle will not be towed and impounded if a licensed driver can retrieve the vehicle within a reasonable amount of time of the traffic stop. The bill would require a peace officer to obtain the approval of a supervisory officer before the towing and impoundment of a vehicle subject to these provisions. By requiring a higher level of service by a local law enforcement agency, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require the release of the impounded vehicle upon the presentation of the registered owner's, or his or her agent's, currently valid driver's license and proof of current vehicle registration, or upon order of a court. This bill would also make conforming changes. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Jun 27, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
43–23
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 72
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic45
91% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
5
Committee
10
Jun 27, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and PUB. S.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-23-6)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 9, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Joint Rule 10.5.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (April 23).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on TRANS.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1993
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1993. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline