State parks: bicycle facilities.
Summary
Existing law vests the Department of Parks and Recreation with control of the state park system and specifies that certain funds are available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for state park planning, acquisition, and development projects, among other things. Existing law imposes various taxes, including taxes on the privilege of engaging in certain activities. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill would, on and after January 1, 2013, impose a surcharge on every retailer for the privilege of selling a new bicycle in this state at the rate of $2 per new bicycle. This would constitute a change in state statute that would result in a taxpayer paying a higher tax within the meaning of Section 3 of Article XIII A of the California Constitution, and thus would require for passage the approval of 23 of the membership of each house of the Legislature. The bill would require that, commencing with the 2013–14 fiscal year, the new bicycle surcharge be administered by the State Board of Equalization and collected by the board in accordance with the Fee Collection Procedures Law. By expanding the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would require each person required to pay the surcharge to prepare and file with the board a return using electronic media in the form prescribed by the board, containing specified information. The bill would deposit the revenues, less refunds, of the surcharge into the State Park Bicycle Facilities Fund, which this bill would create, and would require that moneys in the fund, upon appropriation by the Legislature, be used by the Department of Parks and Recreation for specified purposes related to the creation and maintenance of bicycle trails. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 23, 2012
Last action Apr 24, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
9
Key actions
3
Committee
6
Apr 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 21, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on W., P. & W.
lower
Feb 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 25.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WA
Wilmer Amina Carter
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1989
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1989. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline