Beverage containers: handling fees: enforcement.
Summary
(1) The existing California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act requires a distributor of specified beverage containers to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Resource Recycling and Recovery, for each beverage container, as defined, sold or transferred, for deposit in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. From the fund, the department is continuously appropriated the amount necessary to pay handling fees to provide an incentive for the redemption of empty beverage containers in convenience zones. The department is required to pay a handling fee in an amount determined by subtracting the amount of the statewide average per-container cost to redeem beverage containers incurred by a certified recycler that does not receive a handling fee from the statewide average per-container cost incurred by recycling centers that receive handling fees, based on a survey the department is required to conduct at least once every 2 years to determine the actual cost for the redemption of beverage containers. This bill would require the per-container handling fee to be set, as of the effective date of this act, until March 1, 2013, at an amount that is not less than the amount of the per-container handling fee that was in effect on July 1, 2011. The bill would authorize the department to update the methodology and scrap values used for calculating the handling fee, as specified. The bill would make an appropriation by increasing the amount that the department is authorized to pay from a continuously appropriated fund. (2) Existing law requires any person importing more than a 100 pounds of aluminum, bimetal, or plastic beverage container material, or more than 1,000 pounds of glass beverage container material, into the state to report the material and to provide an opportunity for inspection and prohibits any person from falsifying documents required pursuant to the act or the regulations adopted by the department. A violation of the act is a crime. This bill would decrease the amount of materials for which a person is required to report to the department to 25 pounds of empty aluminum, bimetal, or plastic beverage container material, or more than 250 pounds of empty glass beverage container material, and would additionally require the person to provide the department with certain documentation regarding those materials. The bill would require a vehicle entering the state that contains more than 25 pounds of empty beverage container material to pass through the nearest plant quarantine inspection station and obtain proof of inspection from the department. The bill would authorize the department to enter into a interagency agreement with the Department of Food and Agriculture to implement this requirement. The bill would provide that an operator of a vehicle that contains more than 25 pounds of empty beverage container material is in violation of the act if the operator fails to stop at, or willfully avoids, a plant quarantine inspection station, as specified. The bill would provide that a 2nd or subsequent violation of this requirement within 3 years of a prior conviction is punishable as a misdemeanor. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Signed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2012 · Assembly Sep 1, 2012
How they voted
25–0
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
75% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
1
Sep 25, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 1, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0)
assembly
Aug 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-0-6)
senate
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6754.).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Amendments returned with further amendments to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.)
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Committee
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Aug 22, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10.
upper
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
May 15, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (April 18).
lower
Mar 28, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1933
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1933. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline