AB 1927 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Easements: maintenance: arbitration.

Summary
Existing law requires the owner of any easement in the nature of a private right-of-way, or of any land to which such an easement is attached, to maintain the easement in repair, and if the easement is owned by more than one person, requires the costs of repair to be shared by each owner pursuant to the terms of an agreement entered into by the parties for that purpose. Existing law provides that if any owner who is a party to an agreement refuses to perform or fails after demand in writing to pay the owner's proportion of the cost, an action for specific performance or contribution may be brought against that owner, as specified. Absent an agreement, existing law apportions the costs proportionately to the use made of the easement by each owner, and authorizes any owner of the easement, or land to which the easement is attached, to apply to a court, as specified, for the appointment of an impartial arbitrator to apportion the cost. This bill, instead, would authorize an owner of the easement, or land to which the easement is attached, to bring an action against any other owner who refuses or fails after demand in writing to pay that owner's share of the cost of maintenance, or for specific performance or contribution. The bill would authorize an action to be brought before, during, or after performance of the maintenance work. The bill would require the action to be filed in superior court, unless the action may be brought in small claims court. The bill would, notwithstanding specified provisions of law, require all actions filed in superior court to be subject to judicial arbitration, as specified. The bill would provide that neither a small claims judgment nor a superior court judgment shall affect apportionment of any future costs that are not requested in the action, unless provided in the judgment. The bill would require that, in the absence of an agreement addressing the maintenance of the easement, any action described above be brought in the county in which the easement is located.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012 Signed Sep 7, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2012 · Assembly May 10, 2012

How they voted

35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Aug 9, 2012
D Democratic24
21 Yea 3
87% Yea
R Republican15
14 Yea 1
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
22
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 7, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 5889.).
lower
Aug 9, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Aug 9, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 5, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (July 3).
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 10, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-6)
assembly
May 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 10). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. GOV.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

No sponsor information available.