Health insurance: transitional reinsurance program.
Summary
Existing law provides for licensing and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. A willful violation of provisions governing health care service plans is a crime. Existing law provides for licensing and regulation of health insurers by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing federal law, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, provides for implementation of certain reforms relative to health care coverage. This bill, until January 1, 2018, would establish a transitional reinsurance program for health plans to be jointly administered by the Department of Insurance and the Department of Managed Health Care, and require participation by health care service plans and health insurers. The bill would require the Insurance Commissioner and the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care to jointly select a reinsurance entity, which would collect payments from contributing health plans and the United States Department of Health and Human Services on behalf of self-insured group plans and pay claims, as specified. The bill would authorize the commissioner and the Director of Managed Health Care to take various actions to implement the program. The bill would also authorize the Director of the Department of Managed Health Care to opt out of administration of the program and defer to the Department of Insurance. The bill would require contributing entities to make payments to the reinsurance entity no earlier than October 1, 2013, and would provide for the reinsurance entity to pay claims to a reinsurance-eligible recipient no earlier than January 1, 2014, with payments and claims to cease on December 31, 2016, except for necessary adjustments. Because a willful violation of the bill's provisions with respect to health care service plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Last action Jun 27, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
41–23
Passed · 8 other
Total votes 72
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic45
91% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican26
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Jun 27, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-23-8)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 9, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (April 17).
lower
Apr 11, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jerry Hill
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1921
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1921. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline