Department of Consumer Affairs: construction defect solicitations.
Summary
Under existing law, the Department of Consumer Affairs is comprised of boards that license and regulate various professions and vocations. Existing law provides that these boards are established to ensure that private businesses and professions are regulated to protect the people of this state. Under existing law, the department is under the control of the Director of Consumer Affairs. Existing law requires the director to administer and enforce the provisions of the Consumer Affairs Act, the intent of which is to promote and protect the interests of the people as consumers. Existing law also specifies the rights of a homeowner to bring an action against a builder for construction defects, including the applicable standards for home construction, the statute of limitations, the burden of proof, the damages recoverable, prelitigation procedures, and the obligations of the homeowner. This bill would require the department to post a notice on its Internet Web site advising a consumer who receives a construction defect solicitation to check with his or her builder in addition to taking other further action.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Vetoed Sep 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 17, 2012
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Sep 13, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 13, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 3, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
May 17, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
May 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 9).
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 24). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Mar 8, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
LH
Linda Halderman
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1892
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1892. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline