Employer use of social media.
Summary
Existing law generally regulates the conduct of employers in the state. This bill would prohibit an employer from requiring or requesting an employee or applicant for employment to disclose a username or password for the purpose of accessing personal social media, to access personal social media in the presence of the employer, or to divulge any personal social media. This bill would also prohibit an employer from discharging, disciplining, threatening to discharge or discipline, or otherwise retaliating against an employee or applicant for not complying with a request or demand by the employer that violates these provisions. Under existing law, the Labor Commissioner, who is the Chief of the Division of Labor Standards Enforcement in the Department of Industrial Relations, is required to establish and maintain a field enforcement unit to investigate specified violations of the Labor Code and other labor laws and to enforce minimum labor standards. Existing law authorizes, and under specified circumstances requires, the Labor Commissioner to investigate employee complaints of violations of the Labor Code, provide for a hearing, and determine all matters arising under his or her jurisdiction. This bill would provide that the Labor Commissioner is not required to investigate or determine any violation of a provision of this bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 22, 2012
Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2012 · Assembly May 10, 2012
How they voted
23–4
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 31
Aug 28, 2012
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
54% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
36
Key actions
9
Committee
10
Amendments
3
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 29, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6542.).
lower
Aug 28, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (23-4-4)
senate
Aug 28, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 28, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27).
upper
Jun 4, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
May 10, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (65-0-5)
assembly
May 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 30, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Apr 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on L. & E. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 24).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Coms. on JUD. and L. & E. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Mar 5, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. & E.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 24.
lower
1 primary · 10 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Co
Ben Hueso
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Co
HP
Henry Perea
DDemocratic
Co
Leland Yee
DDemocratic
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Co
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Co
Richard Gordon
DDemocratic
Co
RH
Roger Hernández
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1844
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1844. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline