California Architects Board.
Summary
Existing law, the Architects Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of architects by the California Architects Board, which consists of 5 architect members appointed by the Governor, 3 public members appointed by the Governor, and 2 public members appointed by the Legislature, as specified. Existing law requires these members to serve 4-year terms. This bill would provide for the staggering of the terms of the members appointed by the Governor whose terms commence on specified dates by requiring certain of those members to serve 5- and 6-year terms, as specified. Under existing law, an individual applicant for a license to practice architecture is required to provide his or her social security number to the board. Existing law prohibits the board from processing an application unless the applicant furnishes this information, and requires the board to report a licensee who fails to provide this information to the Franchise Tax Board. This bill would authorize submission of an individual tax identification number or another identification number, as determined by the board, in place of a social security number where the applicant is not eligible for a social security number and is not out of compliance with a child support judgment or order, as specified.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 21, 2012
Signed Sep 14, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly Apr 16, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
1
Sep 14, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6366.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jul 3, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (July 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 31, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Apr 16, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
Apr 11, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & C.P.
lower
Feb 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
BB
Bill Berryhill
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1822
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1822. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline