Child abuse reporting.
Summary
Existing law, the Child Abuse and Neglect Reporting Act, requires a mandated reporter, as defined, to report whenever he or she, in his or her professional capacity or within the scope of his or her employment, has knowledge of or observed a child whom the mandated reporter knows or reasonably suspects has been the victim of child abuse or neglect. Failure to report an incident is a crime punishable by imprisonment in a county jail for a period of 6 months, a fine of up to $1,000, or by both that imprisonment and fine. Existing law requires any commercial film and photographic print processor who has knowledge of or observed in his or her professional capacity or employment any film, photograph, videotape, negative, or slide depicting a child under 16 years of age engaging in an act of sexual conduct to report the instance of suspected child abuse to a law enforcement agency, as specified. This bill would make these provisions apply to a commercial computer technician, as provided. The bill would provide that an employer who provides an electronic communications service or a remote computing service to the public would comply with this article by complying with a specified provision of existing federal law. The bill would provide that any commercial computer technician who provides a computer or computer component to an investigating law enforcement agency pursuant to a warrant shall have immunity from civil or criminal liability for providing that computer or computer component, as specified. The bill would also make technical, nonsubstantive changes and would update a cross-reference. This bill would make conforming changes. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 11165.7 of the Penal Code, proposed by AB 1434, AB 1435, AB 1713, and SB 1264, to be operative only if AB 1434, AB 1435, AB 1713, or SB 1264 and this bill are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. The bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 11166 of the Penal Code, proposed by AB 1713, to be operative only if AB 1713 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2013, and this bill is chaptered last. By imposing the reporting requirements on a new class of persons, for whom failure to report specified conduct is a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 21, 2012
Signed Sep 24, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 29, 2012 · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
31–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 35
Aug 29, 2012
D
Democratic23
91% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
32
Key actions
11
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Sep 24, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6645.).
lower
Aug 29, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (31-0-4)
senate
Aug 29, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 31 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 19).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-0-5)
assembly
May 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 9).
lower
May 8, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 23, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
0 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1817
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1817. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline