Land use: fees.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires fees charged by a local agency for specified purposes to not exceed the estimated reasonable cost of providing the service for which the fee is charged, unless a question regarding the amount of the fee charged in excess of this cost is submitted to, and approved by, 23 of the electors. The Planning and Zoning law requires a city or county to administratively approve applications to install solar energy systems, as defined, through the issuance of a building permit or similar nondiscretionary permit. This bill would prohibit a city, county, or city and county from basing the calculation of the fee charged for a solar energy system on the valuation of the solar energy system, or any other factor not directly associated with the cost to issue the permit, or from basing the calculation of the fee on the valuation of the property or the improvement, materials, or labor costs associated with the improvement. The bill would also require the city, county, or city and county to separately identify each fee assessed on the applicant for the installation of a solar energy system on the invoice provided to the applicant. (2) The bill would also express a legislative finding and declaration that oversight of permit fees for renewable energy systems is an issue of statewide concern and not a municipal affair and that, therefore, all cities, including charter cities, would be subject to the provisions of the bill.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 21, 2012
Signed Sep 25, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2012 · Assembly May 10, 2012
How they voted
38–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 39
Aug 9, 2012
D
Democratic24
95% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 25, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 5903.).
lower
Aug 9, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (38-0-1)
senate
Aug 9, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 15, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 13).
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 10, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (73-0-6)
assembly
May 3, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Co
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1801
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1801. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline