Education: academic performance.
Summary
Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API) , as part of the Public School Performance Accountability Program, to measure the performance of schools, especially the academic performance of pupils. The API consists of a variety of indicators including specified achievement test scores, attendance rates, and graduation rates. Existing law requires the Superintendent, with approval of the state board, to develop an alternative accountability system for specified types of schools, including, among others, community day schools and continuation schools. Existing law allows these schools to receive an API score, but prohibits them from being included in the API rankings of schools. This bill, until January 1, 2017, would require the Superintendent and the state board, as part of the alternative accountability system for schools, or any successor system, to allow no more than 10 dropout recovery high schools, as defined, to report the results of an individual pupil growth model that is proposed by the school and certified by the Superintendent pursuant to specified criteria instead of reporting other indicators.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Jan 24, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 7, 2011 · Assembly Sep 8, 2011
How they voted
26–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 31
Sep 7, 2011
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
10
Committee
7
Amendments
4
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 8, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-1)
assembly
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3058.).
lower
Sep 7, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-0-5)
senate
Sep 7, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (August 25).
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 13, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (June 8).
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (April 6).
lower
Mar 29, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 24, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (March 23).
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Jan 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 24.
lower
1 primary · 4 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 180
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 180. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline