Pupil records: pupil transfers.
Summary
Existing law requires a pupil's former school district, as defined, or private school to transfer the pupil's permanent record, or a copy thereof, upon a request from the school district, as defined, or private school where the pupil intends to enroll. This bill would instead require the former public school or private school to perform the transfer of the pupil's permanent record or copy of it no later than 10 schooldays, as defined, following the date the request is received. The bill would state legislative findings and declarations regarding the importance of the academic record of a transferring pupil and the accuracy of those records. The bill would provide that it does not supersede any other provisions governing the transfer of pupil records for specific pupil populations, including, but not limited to, provisions governing the transfer of pupil records for (1) pupils in foster care and (2) individuals with exceptional needs. By imposing a new requirement on public schools to transfer records within 10 schooldays, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 21, 2012
Signed Sep 19, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 29, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
27
Key actions
10
Committee
9
Amendments
3
Sep 19, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 6384.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 6).
upper
Jun 26, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 20).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 29, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
May 9, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 24, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 11).
lower
Mar 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 23.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Steve Bradford
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1799
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1799. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline