Wage garnishment: exempt earnings.
Summary
The Wage Garnishment Law governs earnings withholding orders and provides definitions of certain terms. Existing law requires a levy of execution upon the earnings of a judgment debtor to be made by service of an earnings withholding order upon the debtor's employer. Existing law limits the amount of earnings of a judgment debtor that may be subject to an earnings withholding order to the amount specified by federal law, unless an exception applies. Federal law prohibits the amount of earnings that may be subject to garnishment from exceeding 25% of an individual's weekly disposable earnings or the amount by which the individual's disposable earnings for the week exceed 30 times the federal minimum hourly wage in effect at the time the earnings are payable. This bill would define "disposable earnings" as the portion of an individual's earnings that remains after deducting all amounts required to be withheld by law. The bill would also prohibit the amount of an individual judgment debtor's weekly disposable earnings subject to levy under an earnings withholding order from exceeding the lesser of 25% of the individual's weekly disposable earnings or the amount by which the individual's disposable earnings for the week exceed 40 times the state minimum hourly wage in effect at the time the earnings are payable, unless an exception applies. For any pay period other than weekly, the bill would also require the use of certain multipliers to determine a maximum amount subject to levy under an earnings withholding order that is proportional in effect to a calculation based on the amount by which the individual's earnings for a workweek exceed 40 times the state minimum wage, except as specified. This bill would become operative on July 1, 2013. In order to implement these provisions, the bill would also require the Judicial Council to, on or before July 1, 2013, revise the instructions contained in certain documents provided to employers in order to specify the method of computation described above.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2012
Signed Sep 23, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 20, 2012 · Assembly Apr 23, 2012
How they voted
21–16
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 39
Aug 20, 2012
D
Democratic24
87% Yea
R
Republican15
100% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Sep 23, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 22, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 6105.).
lower
Aug 20, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-16-2)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 4. Noes 1.) (May 9).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
Apr 23, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (45-25-9)
assembly
Apr 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1775
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1775. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline