Peace officers: City of Los Angeles.
Summary
Existing law provides that an officer of the Department of General Services of the City of Los Angeles is a peace officer if he or she is designated by the general manager of the department and his or her primary duty is the enforcement of the law in or about properties owned, operated, or administered by the department or when performing necessary duties with respect to patrons, employees, and properties of the department. A peace officer designated pursuant to those provisions and authorized to carry firearms by the department is required to complete an introductory course of firearm training and requalify for the use of firearms every 6 months, and prohibits the peace officer from carrying a firearm when he or she is not on duty. This bill would instead provide that an officer of the Department of General Services who was transferred to the Los Angeles Police Department is a peace officer if he or she is designated by the Chief of Police of the Los Angeles Police Department, or his or her designee, and the peace officer's primary duty is the enforcement of the law in or about properties owned, operated, or administered by the City of Los Angeles or when performing necessary duties, as specified. The bill would delete the provisions requiring a peace officer designated pursuant to those provisions to requalify for the use of firearms every 6 months, and would also delete the prohibition on carrying firearms while not on duty.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 17, 2012
Last action Aug 27, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 30, 2012
How they voted
77–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 79
May 30, 2012
D
Democratic51
100% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican27
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
5
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Aug 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Aug 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
upper
May 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-0-2)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 25).
lower
May 25, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 9, 2012
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 26, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on PUB. S.
lower
Feb 21, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MD
Mike Davis
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1763
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1763. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline