Standardized testing: valid identification.
Summary
Existing law imposes various requirements on a test sponsor or test agency, as defined, with respect to the administration of standardized tests for purposes of postsecondary education. Existing law provides that a test sponsor that intentionally violates these provisions is liable for a civil penalty not to exceed $750 for each violation. This bill would require a test sponsor to provide alternative methods to verify a test subject's identity and to clearly post on the test sponsor's Internet Web site contact information for test subjects who cannot provide the required identification and need further assistance. A violation of these requirements would subject a test sponsor to the above civil penalty. The bill would allow a test sponsor to require test subjects to obtain approval from the test sponsor in advance of the registration test deadline in order to be admitted to the test with an alternative form of identification.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Jun 2011
Signed into Law
Jul 2011
Introduced Jan 24, 2011
Signed Jul 1, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Jun 16, 2011 · Assembly Apr 14, 2011
How they voted
21–9
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Jun 16, 2011
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
21
Key actions
8
Committee
5
Amendments
3
Jun 30, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 56. Noes 10. Page 1997.).
lower
Jun 16, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (21-9-1)
senate
Jun 16, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 18 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 14, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (June 8).
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (49-2-18)
assembly
Mar 30, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (March 29).
lower
Mar 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Jan 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 24.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 176
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 176. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline