Family law: adoption.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for the termination of parental rights in adoption proceedings. In connection with those proceedings, existing law requires a court to inquire of the mother and other specified persons and entities in an effort to identify the natural father of the child to be adopted. This bill would permit a court to extend its inquiry as to the child's parentage, in cases involving stepparent adoptions, to the licensed clinical social worker or licensed marriage and family therapist investigating the adoption, if applicable. (2) Existing law provides that parental rights may be terminated under certain circumstances, including where the child has been abandoned, neglected, or abused by his or her parent or parents, and if the child has been declared a dependent of the juvenile court. This bill would eliminate superseded statutory provisions concerning the termination of the parental rights of dependent children. (3) Under existing law, when a petition to declare a child free from parental custody and control is filed, the person having custody or control of the child must be served with a citation requiring that person and the child to appear in court, except as specified. A proceeding to declare a child free from parental custody and control is required to be set for trial within 45 days of service of the petition. This bill would require the party or attorney responsible for serving the citation in a proceeding to declare a child free from parental custody and control to serve the citation promptly. The bill would further require the hearing on the petition be held within 45 days of the filing of the petition. Additionally, this bill would authorize a court to issue an order in that proceeding without a trial if service has been completed and no interested person appears to contest the petition. (4) Existing law provides that, after a consent to an adoption is signed by the birth parent or parents, the birth parent or parents signing the consent have 30 days to take one of specified actions, including signing a waiver of the right to revoke consent. Under existing law, a waiver must be signed in the presence of a representative of the department or the delegated county adoption agency, the adoption service provider who advised the birth mother and witnessed the signing of the consent to the adoption if the birth parent or parents are represented by independent legal counsel, or if the birth parent or parents are represented by independent legal counsel, the waiver can also be signed in the presence of a judicial officer of the court of record or an adoption service provider. This bill would permit a relinquishing birth parent to sign a waiver of the right to revoke relinquishment in the presence of a representative of the department or delegated county adoption agency, a public adoption agency of another state, or, if the birth parent or parents are represented by independent legal counsel, an authorized representative of a licensed private adoption agency in or outside of California, or by a judicial officer of a court in or outside of California. The bill would also set forth the role of independent legal counsel, as specified. The bill would set forth a specified certificate for that counsel to use in those proceedings. To the extent that this bill would impose new duties on county agencies, it would impose a state-mandated local program. (5) Under existing law, a petition for adoption may be filed in the county in which the petitioner resides, where the birth parent or parents relinquished the child, where the placing birth parent or parents resided when the adoption placement agreement was signed, where the adoption agency, department, or public adoption agency is located, or, in the case of a dependent child, in the county where the child was freed for adoption. This bill would revise and consolidate these provisions by providing that an adoption petition of a nondependent child may be filed in any of those locations. The bill would not alter the venue provisions for the adoption of dependent children. (6) Existing law requires prospective adoptive parents to pay a fee to the department or delegated county adoption agency for the cost of investigating the adoption petition. Petitioners with valid preplacement evaluations are charged a lesser fee for that investigation. Under this bill, petitioners with an agency adoption home study less than 2 years old would also be eligible for this lesser fee. In addition, this bill would provide that petitioners with a valid preplacement evaluation are eligible for the lesser fee only if that evaluation is less than one year old. (7) Existing law permits a court investigator, probation officer, or domestic relations investigator to investigate and file a report containing recommendations concerning a proposed guardianship of a person. If the investigation reveals that any party to the proposed guardianship is alleging that the minor's parent is unfit, the court is required to refer the case to the county agency designated to investigate potential dependencies. Under existing law, the guardianship proceedings cannot be completed until the dependency investigation is completed and the probate court receives the agency's report. This bill would give a court in a guardianship proceeding involving a minor discretion to order an investigation by Child Protective Services. Under the bill, the probate court could take any reasonable steps the court deemed necessary to protect the child's safety, including appointing a temporary guardian or issuing a temporary restraining order. The bill would also provide that the author of any guardianship investigation reports and dependency investigation reports could be examined in probate court concerning the report, and would authorize the court to make the final decision regarding guardianship. Further, this bill would make all guardianship investigation reports and dependency investigation reports confidential. (8) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 17, 2012
Signed Sep 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 21, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 21, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
29
Key actions
8
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Sep 27, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 24, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 6240.).
lower
Aug 22, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 21, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Jul 2, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 26).
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-0-4)
assembly
May 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 17). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
lower
Feb 21, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1757
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1757. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline