Local government: open meetings.
Summary
(1) The Ralph M. Brown Act requires each legislative body of a local agency to provide the time and place for holding regular meetings and requires that all meetings of a legislative body be open and public. Under the act, all persons are permitted to attend any meeting of the legislative body of a local agency, unless a closed session is authorized. Under the act, the legislative body of a local agency is authorized to hold closed sessions with the Attorney General, district attorney, agency counsel, sheriff, or chief of police, or their respective deputies, or a security consultant or a security operations manager, on matters posing a threat to the security of public buildings, a threat to the security of essential public services, as specified, or a threat to the public's right of access to public services or public facilities. This bill would authorize the legislative body of a local agency to hold these closed sessions with the Governor and other specified individuals. This bill would require a legislative body of a local agency that meets in these specified types of a closed session to include additional information in its posted agenda regarding those in attendance. (2) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meetings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with findings demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. This bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (3) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 54954.5 of the Government Code, as proposed by AB 2690 and SB 1395, to be operative depending on when these respective bills are effective and chaptered, as specified.
Bill status
failed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
May 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Governor
Introduced Feb 16, 2012
Last action Aug 27, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 28, 2012 · Assembly Apr 26, 2012
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 28, 2012
D
Democratic20
100% Yea
R
Republican11
90% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
5
Committee
5
Amendments
1
Aug 28, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-1)
senate
Jun 15, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (June 13).
upper
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (57-3-10)
assembly
Apr 12, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 11).
lower
Apr 9, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 17, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
CS
Cameron Smyth
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1736
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1736. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline