Pupils: suspension or expulsion: bullying: impersonation.
Summary
Existing law prohibits the suspension, or recommendation for expulsion, of a pupil from school unless the school district superintendent or the school principal determines that the pupil has committed any of various specified acts, including, but not limited to, bullying. Existing law defines bullying as any severe or pervasive physical or verbal act or conduct, including communications made in writing or by means of an electronic act, which includes, among other things, a post on a social network Internet Web site, and including one or more acts, as specified, committed by a pupil or group of pupils, directed toward one or more pupils that has or can be reasonably predicted to have one or more specified effects. This bill would identify specific conduct that would constitute a post on a social network Internet Web site, including posting to or creating a burn page, as defined, creating a credible impersonation of a pupil, as defined and as specified, and creating a false profile, as defined and as specified. The bill also would provide that an electronic act does not constitute pervasive conduct solely on the basis that it has been transmitted on the Internet or is currently posted on the Internet.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jul 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Jul 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 16, 2012
Signed Jul 23, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jul 2, 2012 · Assembly Apr 16, 2012
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Jul 2, 2012
D
Democratic23
100% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
25
Key actions
7
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jul 23, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jul 5, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 0. Page 5599.).
lower
Jul 2, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Jul 2, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after July 4 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (June 13).
upper
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 16, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-6)
assembly
Mar 29, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 28).
lower
Mar 21, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 17, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 18.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nora Campos
DDemocratic
Co
EA
Elaine Alquist
DDemocratic
Co
LH
Linda Halderman
RRepublican
Co
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1732
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1732. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline