Pervasive developmental disorder or autism.
Summary
(1) Existing law provides for licensing and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care. A willful violation of these provisions is a crime. Existing law provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Insurance Commissioner. Existing law requires health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of severe mental illnesses, including pervasive developmental disorder or autism, under the same terms and conditions applied to other medical conditions, as specified. Commencing July 1, 2012, and until July 1, 2014, existing law requires health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for behavioral health treatment, as defined, for pervasive developmental disorder or autism. This bill would require health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies to provide coverage for the screening, diagnosis, and treatment, other than behavioral health treatment, of pervasive developmental disorder or autism. The bill would, however, provide that no benefits are required to be provided that exceed the essential health benefits that will be required under specified federal law. The bill would prohibit health care service plans and health insurers from denying, terminating, or refusing to renew coverage solely because the individual is diagnosed with or has received treatment for pervasive developmental disorder or autism. Because the bill would change the definition of a crime with respect to health care service plans, it would thereby impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 20, 2011
Last action Jun 26, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 26, 2012
How they voted
42–16
Passed · 12 other
Total votes 70
Jan 26, 2012
D
Democratic44
93% Yea
R
Republican26
61% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
6
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Jun 26, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jan 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (42-16-12)
assembly
Jan 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (January 19).
lower
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 6.) (April 26).
lower
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 21, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 20.
lower
1 primary · 11 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
BB
Bob Blumenfield
DDemocratic
Co
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Co
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
JB
Julia Brownley
DDemocratic
Co
MY
Mariko Yamada
DDemocratic
Co
ME
Mike Eng
DDemocratic
Co
SS
Sandré Swanson
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Co
WC
Wesley Chesbro
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 171
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 171. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline