AB 1708 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Vehicles: electronic verification of financial responsibility and insurance.

Summary
(1) Existing law requires every driver and every owner of a motor vehicle to be able to establish financial responsibility, and, at all times, carry in the vehicle evidence of a form of financial responsibility, which may be obtained by a law enforcement officer from the electronic reporting system established by the Department of Motor Vehicles. Existing law requires, upon the demand of a peace officer, that evidence of registration and proof of financial responsibility be provided by a person driving a motor vehicle. Existing law requires a driver who is issued a notice to appear for any alleged violation of the Vehicle Code or the driver of a motor vehicle involved in an accident to furnish written evidence of financial responsibility. Existing law requires an insurer issuing policies of automobile liability insurance or motor vehicle liability insurance, upon the request of its insured or the Department of Motor Vehicles, to promptly issue written verification as to the existence of that coverage. This bill would authorize an insurer issuing policies of automobile liability insurance or motor vehicle insurance to issue, upon the request of the insured and to the extent available, electronic verification as to the existence of the coverage to a mobile electronic device, as defined, and would allow a person to provide evidence of financial responsibility, under the circumstances described above, through the use of a mobile electronic device. The bill would require, when a person provides evidence of financial responsibility, using a mobile electronic device, to a peace officer, the peace officer to only view the evidence of financial responsibility and would prohibit him or her from viewing any other content on the mobile electronic device. The bill would also require, whenever a person presents a mobile electronic device pursuant to the above-described provisions, the person to assume all liability for any damage to the mobile electronic device. By expanding the duties of local public officials and expanding the scope of existing crimes, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
Bill status signed all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 15, 2012 Signed Sep 7, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 9, 2012 · Assembly Aug 13, 2012

How they voted

35–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 39
Aug 9, 2012
D Democratic24
21 Yea 3
87% Yea
R Republican15
14 Yea 1
93% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
31
Key actions
9
Committee
12
Amendments
2
Sep 7, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 13, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (77-1-1)
assembly
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 1. Page 5887.).
lower
Aug 9, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (35-0-4)
senate
Aug 9, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 11 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jul 3, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 28).
upper
Jun 12, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
upper
Jun 6, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 24, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on T. & H. and INS.
upper
May 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 2).
lower
Apr 23, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 13. Noes 0.) (April 18). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 10, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Mar 14, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Mike Gatto
Mike Gatto
DDemocratic
CA
43