Bankruptcy.
Summary
Existing law authorizes a local public entity, as defined, to file a petition and exercise powers pursuant to applicable federal bankruptcy law, subject to specified procedures, including participation in a neutral evaluation process with interested parties, as defined, or upon a declaration of fiscal emergency, as specified. Existing law prohibits the neutral evaluation established by this process from exceeding more than 60 days following the date the neutral evaluator is selected, unless the local public entity or a majority of participating interested parties elect to extend the process for up to 30 additional days. This bill would revise and recast the bankruptcy procedures that apply to the neutral evaluation process. The bill would authorize the neutral evaluator to toll the limitation period for the neutral evaluation process based upon a finding that the local public entity or any interested parties' conduct in presenting information required under this process prevented the parties from effectively proceeding in the neutral evaluation process. The bill would authorize the neutral evaluator to request and control the process of an independent investigation, as specified. The bill would provide that the neutral evaluation process shall end upon a specified circumstance.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
May 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 15, 2012
Last action Jun 4, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
36–23
Passed · 13 other
Total votes 72
May 31, 2012
D
Democratic45
80% Yea
I
Independent1
0% Nay
R
Republican26
84% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
18
Key actions
2
Committee
5
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (36-23-13)
assembly
May 3, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (April 25). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 17, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 17.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Bob Wieckowski
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1692
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1692. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline