Public employees' retirement.
Summary
Existing state and local public retirement systems provide defined benefits based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation. Existing law defines final compensation for various employment classifications in connection with the benefits provided by these systems. This bill would prohibit the retirement benefit paid to a member of any public retirement system whose service is not included in the federal social security system from exceeding $100,000. The bill would prohibit the retirement benefit paid to a member of any public retirement system whose service is included in the federal social security system from exceeding $80,000. Those amounts would be adjusted annually by each public retirement system using the Consumer Price Index for All Urban Consumers. The above-described provisions would apply to a public employee who is first employed by a public agency and becomes a member of any public retirement system on or after January 1, 2013. The bill would specify that if any of these provisions are in conflict with a memorandum of understanding that is current and in effect on January 1, 2013, the memorandum of understanding would be controlling while it remains in effect, but that upon expiration of that memorandum of understanding, these provisions would be controlling and may not be superseded by a subsequent memorandum of understanding.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 9, 2012
Last action Apr 26, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
4
Key actions
1
Committee
3
Apr 26, 2012
Committee
From committee: That the measure be retained in committee, and that the subject matter be referred to the Committee on Rules for assignment to the proper committee for study. (Ayes 4. Noes 2.) (April 26).
lower
Feb 23, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
Feb 10, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Donald Wagner
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1633
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1633. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline