Mortgages and deeds of trust: mortgage servicers: force-placed insurance.
Summary
Existing law generally regulates mortgages and deeds of trust, including, among other things, recording mortgages and deeds of trust, disclosures in connection with mortgages and deeds of trust, and foreclosure procedures for mortgages and deeds of trust. This bill would prohibit a mortgage servicer, as defined, from obtaining a replacement policy of hazard, flood, or homeowner's insurance, collectively defined as "force-placed insurance," with respect to a residential property securing a mortgage loan, unless there is a reasonable basis to believe that the borrower has failed to comply with contract requirements to maintain hazard, flood, or homeowner's insurance. The bill would require, if a borrower's existing hazard, flood, or homeowner's insurance policy is paid through an escrow account, that the mortgage servicer advance payments to continue the borrower's existing policy, as specified. The bill would require a mortgage servicer to provide written notices, as specified, to a borrower prior to obtaining force-placed insurance. The bill would specify the circumstances, manner, and limitations under which a mortgage servicer may obtain force-placed insurance, and when a borrower is entitled to a refund from the mortgage servicer in connection with that insurance. The bill would authorize a borrower to bring a civil action in connection with the mortgage servicer's violation of the provisions of the bill. The bill would authorize the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney to bring an action for injunctive relief, and for restitution, disgorgement, or damages, as appropriate, for the affected borrowers. The bill would also authorize the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney to include a claim for costs, including reasonable attorney's fees and expenses. The bill would further authorize the Attorney General, district attorney, or city attorney to ask the court to levy a civil penalty not exceeding $10,000 against any mortgage servicer who violates the provisions of the bill.
Bill status
in committee
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 6, 2012
Last action May 31, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
3
Committee
5
Amendments
2
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 9. Noes 7.) (May 25).
lower
May 16, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 23, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Apr 16, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on INS. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (April 10).
lower
Mar 29, 2012
Committee
Referred to Coms. on JUD. and INS.
lower
Feb 7, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 8.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
MF
Mike Feuer
DDemocratic
Co
ME
Mike Eng
DDemocratic
Co
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1603
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1603. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline