Concurrent enrollment in secondary school and community college.
Summary
(1) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to allow pupils whom the district has determined would benefit from advanced scholastic or vocational work to attend community college as special part-time students, subject to parental permission. Existing law makes the authority of a school principal to recommend a pupil for community college summer session contingent upon a determination that the pupil meets various criteria and prohibits the principal from recommending more than 5% of the total number of pupils from any particular grade level who completed that grade immediately prior to the time of recommendation for summer session attendance, except as specified. This bill would authorize the governing board of a school district to authorize a pupil, upon the recommendation from a community college dean of a career technical education department or other appropriate community college career technical education administrator, and with parental consent, to attend a community college during any session or term as a special part-time or full-time student and to undertake one or more courses of career technical education offered at the community college. The bill also would authorize the governing board of a community college district to enter into a formal partnership with a school district or school districts located within its immediate service area to allow secondary school pupils to attend a community college if those pupils have exhausted all opportunities to enroll in an equivalent course at the high school of attendance, adult education program, continuation school, regional occupational center or program, or any other programs offered by the governing board of the school district, and if those pupils may benefit from advanced scholastic, career-technical, or vocational courses, courses in basic skills remediation, preparation for the high school exit examination, or English as a 2nd language, and courses designed to prevent pupils from dropping out of high school. The bill would require the partnership agreement to outline the terms of the partnership, as specified. The bill would require a community college district and a school district, as a condition of and before adopting a partnership agreement, to take testimony from the public and approve or disapprove the proposed partnership agreement at a regularly scheduled open public hearing of their respective governing boards. The bill would require, for each partnership entered into under the bill, the affected community college district and school district to file an annual report, containing specified data, with the Office of the Chancellor of the California Community Colleges. (2) Existing law requires the governing board of a community college district to assign a low enrollment priority to a pupil attending community college pursuant to a recommendation from his or her principal or school district or a petition from his or her parents, in order to ensure that these pupils, admitted as special students, do not displace regularly admitted students. This bill would authorize the governing board of a community college district to assign an enrollment priority to students attending community college pursuant to a partnership agreement established under the bill. The bill would prohibit a community college district from receiving an allowance or apportionment for an instructional activity for which a school district has been, or will be, paid.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 19, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
66–0
Passed · 4 other
Total votes 70
Jun 1, 2011
D
Democratic44
97% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
8
Committee
11
Amendments
3
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Aug 15, 2011
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jul 5, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (June 29).
upper
Jun 20, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (66-0-4)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 10, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 10. Noes 0.) (April 27).
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 16, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on ED. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (March 15). Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Mar 1, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on HIGHER ED. and ED.
lower
Jan 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 19.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 160
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 160. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline