Pupil fees.
Summary
(1) Existing law requires the Legislature to provide for a system of common schools by which a free school is required to be kept up and supported in each district. Existing law prohibits a pupil enrolled in school from being required to pay a fee, deposit, or other charge not specifically authorized by law. This bill would prohibit a pupil enrolled in a public school from being required to pay a pupil fee, as defined, for participation in an educational activity, as defined, as specified. The bill would provide that this prohibition is not to be interpreted to prohibit solicitation of voluntary donations, voluntary participation in fundraising activities, or school districts, schools, and other entities from providing pupils prizes or other recognition for voluntarily participating in fundraising activities. The bill would specify that these provisions apply to all public schools, including, but not limited to, charter schools and alternative schools, are declarative of existing law, and should not be interpreted to prohibit the imposition of a fee, deposit, or other charge otherwise allowed by law. The bill would require the State Department of Education, commencing with the 2014–15 fiscal year, and every 3 years thereafter, to develop and distribute guidance for county superintendents of schools, district superintendents, and charter school administrators regarding the imposition of pupil fees for participation in educational activities in public schools. The bill would require the department to post the guidance on its Internet Web site and would provide that the guidance does not constitute a regulation subject to specified law. (2) Existing regulations establish uniform complaint procedures that require each local educational agency to adopt policies and procedures for the investigation and resolution of complaints regarding violations of state and federal laws and regulations governing educational programs. This bill would authorize a complaint of noncompliance with the provisions of this bill to be filed with the principal of a school under those uniform complaint procedures. The bill would authorize a complaint to be filed anonymously if specified circumstances exist. The bill would authorize a complainant not satisfied with a public school's decision to appeal that decision to the State Department of Education and receive a written appeal decision within 60 days of the department's receipt of the appeal. If merit is found in either the complaint or appeal, the bill would require the public school to provide a remedy to all affected pupils, parents, and guardians that, where applicable, includes reasonable efforts by the public school to ensure full reimbursement. The bill would require information regarding the requirements of this bill to be included in a specified annual notification. The bill would require public schools to establish local policies and procedures to implement these complaint procedures by March 1, 2013. By imposing new requirements on local educational agencies, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (3) Existing law excepts certain claims from the requirement that all claims for money or damages against local public entities be presented in accordance with specified law. This bill would additionally except specified claims for reimbursement of pupil fees for participation in educational activities. (4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 1, 2012
Signed Sep 29, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 23, 2012 · Assembly May 31, 2012
How they voted
22–10
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Aug 23, 2012
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Amendments
3
Sep 29, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 27, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 27. Page 6382.).
lower
Aug 24, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 23, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (22-10-3)
senate
Aug 20, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (August 16).
upper
Aug 6, 2012
Committee
In committee: Referred to APPR. suspense file.
upper
Jun 28, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
May 31, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (44-21-7)
assembly
May 25, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 25).
lower
Apr 18, 2012
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1575
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1575. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline