School attendance: residency requirements: foster children.
Summary
Existing law requires persons between the ages of 6 and 18 to attend a public school within the school district in which the pupil's parent or legal guardian resides, unless otherwise exempted. Under existing law, a pupil is deemed to have complied with that residency requirement if the pupil attends a public school within the school district in which his or her foster home is located. Existing law also requires a local educational agency serving a foster child to allow the child to remain in his or her school of origin, as defined, for the duration of the jurisdiction of the juvenile court. This bill would deem a pupil who is a foster child who remains in his or her school of origin to have met the residency requirements for school attendance in that school district. To the extent that this bill would impose additional duties on a school district of origin, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to these statutory provisions.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2012
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
Apr 2012
Senate Passage
Jun 2012
Signed into Law
Jul 2012
Introduced Feb 1, 2012
Signed Jul 13, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 28, 2012 · Assembly Apr 12, 2012
How they voted
29–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 31
Jun 28, 2012
D
Democratic20
90% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
19
Key actions
7
Committee
8
Jul 13, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Jun 28, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (29-0-2)
senate
Jun 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.
lower
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
May 16, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 16). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
May 3, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Apr 12, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (62-0-8)
assembly
Mar 28, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (March 28).
lower
Mar 22, 2012
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Feb 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 2, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 3.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Julia Brownley
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1573
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1573. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline