Health care coverage: mental health services.
Summary
Existing law, the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, provides for the licensure and regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed Health Care and makes a willful violation of the act a crime. Existing law also provides for the regulation of health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Under existing law, a health care service plan contract and a health insurance policy are required to provide coverage for the diagnosis and treatment of severe mental illnesses of a person of any age. Existing law does not define the term "severe mental illnesses" for this purpose but describes it as including several conditions. This bill would expand this coverage requirement for certain health care service plan contracts and health insurance policies issued, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2013, to include the diagnosis and treatment of a mental illness of a person of any age and would define mental illness for this purpose as a mental disorder defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders IV (DSM-IV) , including substance abuse but excluding nicotine dependence and specified diagnoses defined in the manual, subject to regulatory revision, as specified. The bill would specify that this requirement does not apply to a health care benefit plan, contract, or health insurance policy with the Board of Administration of the Public Employees' Retirement System unless the board elects to purchase a plan, contract, or policy that provides mental health coverage. This bill would also exempt certain health care service contracts entered into by the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board from its provisions. Because this bill would expand coverage requirements for health care service plans, the willful violation of which would be a crime, it would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Feb 2012
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 18, 2011
Last action Jun 27, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 26, 2012
How they voted
41–20
Passed · 9 other
Total votes 70
Jan 26, 2012
D
Democratic44
93% Yea
R
Republican26
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
16
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
upper
Jan 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (41-20-9)
assembly
Jan 19, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 6.) (January 19).
lower
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
lower
Jan 19, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 18.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
RD
Roger Dickinson
DDemocratic
Co
TA
Tom Ammiano
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 154
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 154. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline