State Board of Equalization: administration: retailer engaged in business in this state.
Summary
The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state, measured by sales price. That law defines a "retailer engaged in business in this state" to include retailers that engage in specified activities in this state and requires every retailer engaged in business in this state and making sales of tangible personal property for storage, use, or other consumption in this state to register with the State Board of Equalization and to collect the tax from the purchaser and remit it to the board. This bill would include in the definition of a retailer engaged in business in this state any retailer entering into agreements under which a person or persons in this state, for a commission or other consideration, directly or indirectly refer potential purchasers, whether by an Internet-based link or an Internet Web site, or otherwise, to the retailer, provided the total cumulative sales price from all sales by the retailer to purchasers in this state that are referred pursuant to these agreements is in excess of $10,000, within the preceding 12 months, and provided further that the retailer has cumulative sales of tangible personal property to purchasers in this state of over $500,000, within the preceding 12 months, except as specified. This bill would further provide that a retailer entering specified agreements to purchase advertising is not a retailer engaged in business in this state and would define a retailer to include an entity affiliated with a retailer under federal income tax law, as specified. This bill would further provide that these provisions would not apply if the retailer can demonstrate that the referrals would not satisfy specified United States constitutional requirements, as provided. This bill would provide that the provisions of this bill are severable.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Jan 18, 2011
Last action Jun 30, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 1, 2011
How they voted
43–20
Passed · 7 other
Total votes 70
Jun 1, 2011
D
Democratic44
95% Yea
R
Republican26
76% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
17
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Jun 30, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 21, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Jun 1, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (43-20-7)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (March 21). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 7, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
lower
Feb 3, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Jan 19, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 18.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Co
JW
Jared William Huffman
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 153
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 153. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline