California Environmental Quality Act: exemption: Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System.
Summary
(1) The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency, as defined, to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify the completion of, an environmental impact report (EIR) on a project that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. CEQA also requires a lead agency to prepare a mitigated negative declaration for a project that may have a significant effect on the environment if revisions in the project would avoid or mitigate that effect and there is no substantial evidence that the project, as revised, would have a significant effect on the environment. This bill would, until January 1, 2017, exempt from CEQA the design, site acquisition, construction, operation, or maintenance of certain structures and equipment of the Los Angeles Regional Interoperable Communications System (LA-RICS) , consisting of a long-term evolution broadband mobile data system and a land mobile radio system, if certain criteria are met at the individual project site. Because a lead agency, which may include a local agency, is required to determine whether a project qualifies for this exemption, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. (2) This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute because of unique circumstances surrounding the implementation of the LA-RICS. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. (4) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2012
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Mar 2012
Senate Passage
Aug 2012
Signed into Law
Sep 2012
Introduced Jan 10, 2012
Signed Sep 28, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Aug 31, 2012 · Assembly Mar 22, 2012
How they voted
25–5
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 31
Aug 31, 2012
D
Democratic20
70% Yea
R
Republican11
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
35
Key actions
7
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Sep 28, 2012
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 31, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (25-5-1)
senate
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 3. Page 6782.).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 31).
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Aug 31, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Aug 30, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Return to Senate floor for consideration. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (August 30).
upper
Aug 29, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Aug 27, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jun 7, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on B. & F.R.
upper
Apr 19, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Mar 22, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-22-8)
assembly
Feb 9, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on BUDGET.
lower
Jan 11, 2012
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 10.
lower
1 primary · 7 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1486
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1486. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline