Tribal gaming: compact ratification.
Summary
Existing federal law, the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, provides for the negotiation and execution of tribal-state gaming compacts for the purpose of authorizing certain types of gaming on Indian lands within a state. The California Constitution authorizes the Governor to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature. Existing law expressly ratifies a number of tribal-state gaming compacts, and amendments of tribal-state gaming compacts, between the State of California and specified Indian tribes. Existing law ratifies the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Pinoleville Pomo Nation executed on March 9, 2009. This bill would repeal those provisions ratifying the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and Pinoleville Pomo Nation, executed on March 9, 2009. The bill would instead ratify the tribal-state gaming compact entered into between the State of California and the Pinoleville Pomo Nation, executed on August 8, 2011. Existing law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) , requires a lead agency to prepare, or cause to be prepared, and certify completion of, an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant effect on the environment, as defined, or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. This bill would provide that, in deference to tribal sovereignty, certain actions shall not be deemed projects for purposes of CEQA. By imposing additional duties on a lead agency with regard to the implementation of CEQA requirements, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Mar 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Mar 21, 2011
Signed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 9, 2011 · Assembly Sep 10, 2011
How they voted
34–0
Passed · 1 other
Total votes 35
Sep 9, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
100% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
34
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
1
Oct 2, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Sep 10, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (67-1-4)
assembly
Sep 9, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (34-0-1)
senate
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Urgency clause adopted. Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 75. Noes 1. Page 3214.).
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (September 9).
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c).
upper
Jul 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
upper
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 4, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: to consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 25, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on G.O.
lower
Mar 22, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee April 21.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Isadore Hall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1418
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1418. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline