Property taxation: override rates: validation by auditor.
Summary
Existing property tax law generally prohibits a local jurisdiction, in the 1985–86 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, from imposing a property tax rate pursuant to a specified statutory provision in excess of the rate so imposed by that jurisdiction in specified fiscal years, unless it is imposed for specified purposes, including, among others, to make payments in support of certain pension programs. This bill would, if a local jurisdiction increases or extends a property tax rate, on or after January 1, 2012, for the purpose specified above, require the county auditor to, prior to the increase or extension of the property tax rate, verify that the rate increased or extended by the jurisdiction does not exceed the maximum rate authorized by law. This bill would require the jurisdiction to provide the county auditor with any documentation that is necessary to assist the county auditor in making the verification, as provided, and to reimburse the county auditor for the actual and reasonable costs incurred by the county auditor in administering the verification. This bill would require the county auditor to reject the increase or extension of any property tax rate that exceeds the maximum rate authorized by law. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 15, 2011 · Assembly Aug 30, 2011
How they voted
33–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 35
Aug 15, 2011
D
Democratic23
95% Yea
R
Republican12
91% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
8
Committee
7
Amendments
2
Oct 2, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 30, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-1-1)
assembly
Aug 30, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 78. Noes 1. Page 2684.).
lower
Aug 15, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (33-0-2)
senate
Aug 15, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 17 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1350
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1350. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline