Local government: fines and penalties: assessments.
Summary
Existing law authorizes the legislative body of a local agency to make any violation of any ordinance enacted by the local agency subject to an administrative fine or penalty, as specified. This bill would, until January 1, 2020, authorize a city, county, or city and county to, after notice and public hearing, specially assess any fines or penalties not paid after demand by the city, county, or city and county against real property owned by the person owing those fines or penalties where the fines or penalties are related to ordinance violations on the real property upon which the fines or penalties would be specially assessed, and the ordinance violations constitute a threat to public health and safety. This bill would require a city, county, or city and county to comply with certain notice requirements. The bill would provide that the assessment may be collected at the same time and in the same manner as ordinary county taxes are collected, and shall be subject to the same penalties and the same procedure and sale in case of delinquency as are provided for ordinary county taxes, and would authorize the city, county, or city and county to record a lien against the property. This bill would authorize a local agency to appoint a hearing officer to hear and decide issues regarding ordinance violations and the imposition of administrative fines and penalties. This bill would, until January 1, 2020, provide that the powers given to the legislative body of a city, county, or city and county under these provisions are in addition to any other powers of a city, county, or city and county under its charter or any other legal authority.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Jan 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Apr 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Jan 11, 2011
Vetoed Oct 2, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly Apr 14, 2011
How they voted
38–16
Passed · 15 other
Total votes 69
Apr 14, 2011
D
Democratic44
86% Yea
R
Republican25
60% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Oct 2, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 2, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 50. Noes 27. Page 2871.).
lower
Aug 31, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after September 2 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Jun 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (June 22).
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 12, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
upper
Apr 14, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-16-15)
assembly
Apr 7, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 6. Noes 3.) (April 6).
lower
Jan 27, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Jan 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee February 12.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 129
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 129. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline