Public retirement systems: reporting.
Summary
The Public Employees' Retirement Law provides a defined benefit to members of the Public Employees' Retirement System (PERS) based on age at retirement, service credit, and final compensation, as those terms are defined. The management and control of PERS is vested in the Board of Administration of PERS, including the calculation of the contribution rates for specified state employees and state employers. Existing law requires the board to submit a report to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Treasurer describing the investment return assumptions, discount rates, and amortization periods utilized by the board in the calculations of the contribution rates and to include recalculations of those rates based on specified adjustments of the investment return assumptions, amortization periods, and discount rates utilized by the board any time it calculates the contribution rates. Existing law requires the Treasurer, within 30 days following receipt of the report, to provide each house of the Legislature, at a publicly noticed floor session, with an explanation of the role played by the investment return assumption and amortization period in the calculation of the contribution rates and the consequences for future state budgets if the investment return assumptions are not realized, to report whether the board's amortization period exceeds the estimated average remaining service periods of employees covered by the contributions, and to express his or her opinion of the reasonableness of the board's calculation of the contribution rates. This bill would require the Board of Administration of PERS to submit that report annually to the Legislature, the Governor, and the Chair of the California Actuarial Advisory Panel, would limit the scope of the report to state employee retirement plans, and would revise the adjustments of the investment return assumptions and discount rates utilized by the board any time it calculates the contribution rates. The bill would delete the requirement that the Treasurer express his or her opinion of the reasonableness of the board's calculation of the contribution rates. The bill would require the Chair of the California Actuarial Advisory Panel, or his or her designee, instead of the Treasurer, within 30 days following receipt of the report, to provide the Senate Committee on Public Employment and Retirement and the Assembly Committee on Public Employees, Retirement and Social Security, at a publicly noticed joint hearing, with an explanation of the role played by the investment return assumption and amortization period in the calculation of the contribution rates, a description of the consequences for future state budgets if the investment return assumptions are not realized, and a report on whether the board's amortization period exceeds the estimated average remaining service periods of employees covered by the contributions. Existing law also requires the board, at any time it forecasts contribution rates, to submit a report to the Legislature with a revised calculation of the forecasted contribution rates utilizing a specified investment rate assumption. This bill would delete this reporting requirement of the board.
Bill status
signed
all 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Aug 2011
Signed into Law
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Signed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Aug 22, 2011 · Assembly Aug 25, 2011
How they voted
30–0
Passed · 5 other
Total votes 35
Aug 22, 2011
D
Democratic23
86% Yea
R
Republican12
83% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
28
Key actions
8
Committee
10
Amendments
2
Oct 9, 2011
Signed into law
Approved by the Governor.
legislature
Aug 25, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
Aug 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 76. Noes 0. Page 2564.).
lower
Aug 22, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (30-0-5)
senate
Aug 22, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 24 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
Aug 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and be amended.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (June 27). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.
upper
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 10, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 26, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on P.E., R. & S.S.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1247
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1247. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline