Land use and planning: cause of actions: time limitations.
Summary
(1) The Planning and Zoning Law requires an action or proceeding against local zoning and planning decisions of a legislative body to be commenced and the legislative body to be served within a year of accrual of the cause of action, if it meets certain requirements. Where the action or proceeding is brought in support of or to encourage or facilitate the development of housing that would increase the community's supply of affordable housing, a cause of action accrues 60 days after notice is filed or the legislative body takes a final action in response to the notice, whichever occurs first. This bill would authorize the notice to be filed any time within 3 years after a specified action pursuant to existing law. The bill would declare the intent of the Legislature that its provisions modify a specified court opinion. The bill would also provide that in that specified action or proceeding, no remedy pursuant to specified provisions of law abrogate, impair, or otherwise interfere with the full exercise of the rights and protections granted to a tentative map application or a developer, as prescribed. (2) The Planning and Zoning Law establishes a rebuttable presumption, in any action filed on or after January 1, 1991, taken to challenge the validity of a housing element, of the validity of a housing element or amendment if the Department of Housing and Community Development has found that the element or amendment substantially complies with specified provisions of existing law. This bill would provide that in any action brought against a city, county, or city and county to challenge the adequacy of a housing element, if a court finds that the adopted housing element or amended housing element for the current planning period substantially complies with specified provisions, the element or amendment be deemed to satisfy any condition of a state-administered housing grant program requiring a department finding of housing element compliance.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Oct 9, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 12, 2011
How they voted
40–24
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 12, 2011
D
Democratic44
90% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
1
Oct 9, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 3138.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jun 15, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (June 14).
upper
May 31, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on T. & H.
upper
May 12, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-24-6)
assembly
May 5, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 28, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 5. Noes 2.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on H. & C.D.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
Referred to Coms. on H. & C.D. and L. GOV.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
GC
Gilbert Cedillo
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1220
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1220. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline