Electrical transmission.
Summary
Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations, as defined. The Public Utilities Act prohibits any electrical corporation from beginning the construction of, among other things, a line, plant, or system, or of any extension thereof, without having first obtained from the CPUC a certificate that the present or future public convenience and necessity require or will require that construction (certificate of public convenience and necessity) . The existing California renewables portfolio standard program (RPS program) establishes requirements for retail sellers, as defined, and local publicly owned electric utilities, as defined, to procure minimum quantities of eligible renewable energy resources, as defined, for various compliance periods. This bill would require the Independent System Operator (ISO) and the CPUC to jointly evaluate all electrical transmission facilities that have been identified in the ISO's most recently approved transmission plan and determine which of those transmission facilities are necessary or useful to interconnect eligible renewable energy resources to facilitate achievement of the procurement requirements established for retail sellers and local publicly owned electric utilities pursuant to the RPS program. The bill would require the CPUC and ISO, by March 31, 2012, to publish a report that includes a time frame for obtaining all governmental approvals for, construction of, and placement into service of, each of the transmission facilities determined to be necessary or useful to interconnect eligible renewable energy resources pursuant to the bill's requirements. The bill would require the CPUC and the ISO to coordinate the ISO's transmission planning process and identification of needed transmission facilities with the CPUC's issuance of certificates of public convenience and necessity for transmission facilities.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Jun 26, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
68–1
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 72
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
88% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
20
Key actions
6
Committee
9
Amendments
2
Jun 26, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 22, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (68-1-3)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (May 4).
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Nancy Skinner
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1214
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1214. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline