Trial courts: administration.
Summary
Existing law requires the Legislature to make an annual appropriation to the Judicial Council for the general operations of the trial courts based on the request of the Judicial Council, which is submitted to the Governor and the Legislature. The Judicial Council is required to allocate the funding for trial court operations to the trial courts in a manner that best ensures the ability of the courts to carry out their functions, promotes implementation of statewide policies, and promotes the immediate implementation of efficiencies and cost-saving measures in court operations, in order to guarantee access to justice to citizens of the state. Existing law requires the Controller to apportion trial court funding payments to the individual trial courts pursuant to the allocation schedule adopted by the Judicial Council, as specified. This bill would, among other things, delete the provisions relating to the manner in which the Judicial Council allocates funding for trial court operations, and would instead require that the amount allocated to each trial court from the amount appropriated for trial court operations be equal to the pro rata share of the prior fiscal year's adjusted base budget, except as provided. The bill would require the Legislature, based on the information submitted in the Governor's proposed budget, and prior to the allocation of funds to each local trial court in accordance with the allocation schedule adopted by the Judicial Council, to specify, in each annual Budget Act, the funding amounts to be allocated for programs of statewide concern from the total funds appropriated for trial court operations by the Legislature. The bill would prohibit the Judicial Council, or its designee, from withholding or expending any portion of the total funds appropriated for trial court operations by the Legislature for any statewide information technology or administrative infrastructure program that was not identified in the annual Budget Act, unless the Judicial Council, or its designee, first obtains the written approval of 6623% of a proportional representation of all local trial courts. The bill would require the Judicial Council, or its designee, to allocate 100% of the funds appropriated for trial court operations according to each court's share of statewide operational funding. Existing law provides that the Judicial Council retains the ultimate responsibility to adopt a budget and allocate funding for the trial courts, as specified, and empowers the Judicial Council to authorize a trial court to carry unexpended funds over from one fiscal year to the next. This bill would delete those provisions and would instead provide that unexpended funds shall be the funds of that court, which may carry those funds over from one fiscal year to the next. The bill would prohibit those funds from being reallocated or redirected without the consent of the management of the trial court.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
May 2011
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Jan 31, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jan 30, 2012
How they voted
38–23
Passed · 11 other
Total votes 72
Jan 30, 2012
D
Democratic45
53% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
50% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
15
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Amendments
1
Jan 30, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (38-23-11)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 1.) (May 27).
lower
May 27, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 19, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 11, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
May 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 2.) (May 3).
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on JUD. pursuant to Assembly Rule 96.
lower
Apr 7, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on A. & A.R.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
0 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
No sponsor information available.
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1208
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1208. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline