Sales and use taxes: consumer: destination management company.
Summary
The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on retailers measured by the gross receipts from the sale of tangible personal property sold at retail in this state, or on the storage, use, or other consumption in this state of tangible personal property purchased from a retailer for storage, use, or other consumption in this state. That law, with certain exceptions, defines a retailer as a seller that makes any retail sale of tangible personal property and as a person that makes more than 2 retail sales of tangible personal property during any 12-month period, and defines a retail sale as a sale of tangible personal property for any purpose other than resale in the regular course of business. This bill would provide, until January 1, 2016, that a qualified destination management company, as defined, is a consumer, and not a retailer, of tangible personal property it provides to its clients pursuant to a qualified contract, as defined, for destination management services, so that the sale of the tangible personal property to the destination management company is the retail sale subject to tax. The Bradley-Burns Uniform Local Sales and Use Tax Law authorizes counties and cities to impose local sales and use taxes in conformity with the Sales and Use Tax Law, and existing law authorizes districts, as specified, to impose transactions and use taxes in accordance with, which conforms to the Sales and Use Tax Law. Amendments to state sales and use taxes are incorporated in these taxes. Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code provides that the state will reimburse counties and cities for revenue losses caused by the enactment of sales and use tax exemptions. This bill would provide that, notwithstanding Section 2230 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, no appropriation is made and the state shall not reimburse local agencies for sales and use tax revenues lost by them pursuant to this bill. This bill would take effect immediately as a tax levy, but its operative date would depend on its effective date.
Bill status
failed
1 of 4 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Floor Vote
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Feb 1, 2012
Floor votes
How they voted
No floor votes recorded yet.
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
8
Key actions
3
Committee
5
May 16, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, second hearing. Held under submission.
lower
May 16, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, second hearing. Referred to REV. & TAX. suspense file.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Mar 21, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
KD
Kevin D Jeffries
RRepublican
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1190
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1190. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline