Pupils: privacy of pupil records: standardized test scores and grades.
Summary
Existing law establishes the public school system in this state, pursuant to which school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools provide educational services to pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, at elementary and secondary schools throughout the state. Existing law generally requires school districts, as defined to also include county offices of education and charter schools, to establish, maintain, and destroy pupil records according to regulations adopted by the State Board of Education. This bill would prohibit school districts from including, or causing to be included, on a pupil's school identification card or any other object that a pupil is required by school officials to carry on his or her person while present at school, any information about that pupil's scores on standardized tests or the course grades that the pupil has received. The bill would define "information" for these purposes to include the pupil's actual test scores or grades, the percentile or range into which those test scores or grades fall, or any symbol, color, logo, or other device or emblem used to represent or convey any information about those test scores or grades. The bill would express the intent of the Legislature that it not be construed to prohibit schools from honoring or recognizing pupil achievement nor to prohibit a pupil, at his or her option, from wearing or displaying an emblem or insignia that honors or recognizes his or her academic achievements.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2012
Assembly Passage
Jan 2012
Senate Passage
Jun 2012
Vetoed
Sep 2012
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Sep 14, 2012
Floor votes · Senate Jun 18, 2012 · Assembly Jan 26, 2012
How they voted
26–2
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 31
Jun 18, 2012
D
Democratic20
85% Yea
R
Republican11
81% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
26
Key actions
8
Committee
8
Amendments
2
Sep 14, 2012
Vetoed
Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
lower
Sep 14, 2012
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Aug 13, 2012
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 68. Noes 4. Page 5903.).
lower
Jun 18, 2012
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (26-2-3)
senate
Jun 18, 2012
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after June 20 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
lower
May 16, 2012
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 8. Noes 0.) (May 16).
upper
Feb 16, 2012
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
upper
Jan 26, 2012
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (56-5-9)
assembly
Jan 17, 2012
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (January 11).
lower
Jan 4, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on ED.
lower
May 4, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 13, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on ED.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 1 co-sponsor
Sponsors
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1166
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1166. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline