Workers' compensation.
Summary
(1) Existing law establishes a workers' compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers' Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. This bill would state the intent of the Legislature to prohibit the use of risk factors and specified characteristics to deny an injured worker his or her rightful benefit when disabled in the workplace. The bill would also state the intent of the Legislature to prohibit the apportionment of risk factors and characteristics without prohibiting the apportionment of documentable preexisting nonindustrial causes of disability or holding an employer liable for any percentage of permanent disability not directly caused by an injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment. (2) Existing law requires any physician who prepares a report addressing the issue of permanent disability due to a claimed industrial injury to address the issue of causation of the permanent disability, and requires that the report include an apportionment determination in order to be considered complete on the issue of permanent disability. Existing law requires a physician to make an apportionment determination by finding what approximate percentage of the permanent disability is caused by the direct result of injury arising out of and occurring in the course of employment and what approximate percentage is caused by other factors. This bill would prohibit the approximate percentage of the permanent disability caused by other factors from including consideration of race, religious creed, color, national origin, age, gender, marital status, sex, sexual orientation, or genetic characteristics.
Bill status
vetoed
4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Vetoed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 12, 2011
How they voted
40–24
Passed · 6 other
Total votes 70
May 12, 2011
D
Democratic44
90% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
23
Key actions
6
Committee
7
Amendments
3
Oct 7, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 27. Page 3202.).
lower
Sep 9, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Jul 11, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 29, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. & I.R.
upper
Jun 14, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 3. Noes 2.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 26, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on JUD.
upper
May 12, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (40-24-6)
assembly
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 4.) (April 13).
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on INS.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 20 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Luis Alejo
DDemocratic
Co
Ben Hueso
DDemocratic
Co
Bill Monning
DDemocratic
Co
Darrell Steinberg
DDemocratic
Co
DW
Das Williams
DDemocratic
Co
FM
Fiona Ma
DDemocratic
Co
GC
Gilbert Cedillo
DDemocratic
Co
HP
Henry Perea
DDemocratic
Co
Jim Beall
DDemocratic
Co
Loni Hancock
DDemocratic
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1155
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1155. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline