Residential care facilities for the elderly.
Summary
Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of residential care facilities for the elderly, as defined, by the State Department of Social Services. Existing law requires the admission agreement for a residential care facility for the elderly to contain specified elements. Under existing law, a violation of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor. This bill would prohibit a residential care facility for the elderly from assessing personal care fees upon notice of the death of a resident, and would prohibit the facility from assessing fees for the residential living unit of a deceased resident once all personal property of the deceased is removed. This bill would require an admission agreement to include a clear explanation of this prohibition. This bill would limit the liability for the payment of these fees that are not prohibited to prescribed individuals and entities. This bill would also require for a recipient receiving SSI/SSP, that a residential care facility for the elderly meet the requirements for the SSI/SSP program in assessing these fees, as prescribed by law. By expanding the definition of a crime, this bill would result in a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Jun 13, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly May 19, 2011
How they voted
70–0
Passed · 2 other
Total votes 72
May 19, 2011
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
13
Key actions
4
Committee
7
Jun 13, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
upper
May 19, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (70-0-2)
assembly
May 12, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 16. Noes 0.) (May 11).
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (April 26). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Mar 17, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 3 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
WC
Wesley Chesbro
DDemocratic
Co
BL
Bonnie Lowenthal
DDemocratic
Co
LH
Linda Halderman
RRepublican
Co
ML
Mark Leno
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1142
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1142. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline