Telecommunications: location of mobile telephony service facilities on state-owned real property: reporting requirements.
Summary
Existing law requires the Director of General Services to compile and maintain an inventory of state-owned real property, excluding certain property, that may be available for lease to providers of wireless telecommunications services for location of wireless telecommunications facilities, and to provide a requesting party, upon payment of any applicable fee, with a copy of the inventory. Existing law also authorizes the director to negotiate and enter into an agreement to lease department-managed and state-owned real property to a provider of wireless telecommunications services for location of its facilities. Existing law creates the Digital Divide Account within the California Teleconnect Fund Administrative Committee Fund in the State Treasury. Existing law requires that 15% of the revenues from fees collected from the lease of state-owned real property to the providers of wireless telecommunication services pursuant to the above-described provisions, except for revenues from fees collected from a lease agreement for access to Department of Transportation property or a lease agreement existing prior to January 1, 2004, be deposited in the Digital Divide Account, to be available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to finance digital divide projects through the Digital Divide Grant Program. This bill would require the director to submit to the Legislature, by January 31, 3012, a report on actions taken by the director regarding the above provisions including the number of wireless facility lease agreements entered into with providers of wireless telecommunications services and all moneys deposited into the Digital Divide Account.
Bill status
passed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Aug 2011
Assembly Passage
May 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Aug 25, 2011
Floor votes · Assembly May 27, 2011
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 72
May 27, 2011
D
Democratic45
97% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
92% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
22
Key actions
5
Committee
13
Aug 25, 2011
Upper · Passed
In committee: Held under submission.
upper
Jul 6, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 12. Noes 0.) (July 6). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on G.O.
upper
Jun 28, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
upper
Jun 8, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
May 27, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
May 18, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass. To consent calendar. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 18).
lower
May 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Apr 25, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Ricardo Lara
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1131
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1131. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline