AB 1121 California Assembly · 2011-2012 Regular Session

Dog licensing: issuance: puppy licenses.

Summary
Existing law authorizes counties and cities to issue dog licenses and dog license tags for a fee, as specified. Existing law also prohibits a public animal control agency, animal or humane shelter, or a rescue group, as defined, from selling or giving away to a new owner any dog that has not been spayed or neutered, except as specified. A violation of provisions governing the regulation and licensing of dogs is an infraction or a misdemeanor, except as specified. This bill would additionally require each pet dealer, as defined, humane society, rescue group, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, or other specified entity to submit once a month, except as specified, a report to the local governmental entity that is responsible for licensing dogs in the city or county in which the pet dealer, humane society, rescue group, society for the prevention of cruelty to animals, or other specified entity is located. The bill would require the report to contain the name, address, and telephone number of the person who receives a dog, and other information regarding the dog, that was adopted or sold in the previous month, as specified, by the entity submitting the report. The bill would require the entity that submits the report to retain a copy of the report for 12 months. The bill would prohibit the use, distribution, or release of the information contained in the report for any purpose except to ensure compliance with existing state and local law for the purposes of (1) providing notice to the person adopting or purchasing the dog regarding laws requiring the person to obtain a license for the dog and (2) providing notice to another local governmental entity, which is responsible for licensing dogs in the jurisdiction in which the person resides, that the person has adopted or purchased a dog, if the person does not reside in the jurisdiction of the local governmental entity that is providing the notice. A violation of these provisions would be punishable by a civil fine of $50 for the first offense and $100 for each subsequent offense. The bill would exempt an act in violation of these provisions from the provision which would make the violation a crime. By imposing new duties on local officials who would receive and process the monthly reports described above, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would allow a licensing agency to issue to the owner of a microchipped puppy a puppy license, as defined, which would expire when the puppy reaches one year of age, except as specified. The bill would require the owner of a puppy to obtain a dog license tag upon the expiration of the puppy license. Because a violation of this provision would be an infraction, the bill would create a new crime, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. The bill would also make conforming changes. Existing law authorizes a dog license tag to be issued for 12 or less of the usual fee required for a dog if a certificate indicating that the dog has been spayed or neutered is presented from a licensed veterinarian. This bill would authorize the city, county, or city and county to specify the means by which the dog owner may provide proof that the dog has been spayed or neutered. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill status vetoed 4 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Sep 2011
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Sep 2011
Vetoed
Oct 2011
Introduced Feb 18, 2011 Vetoed Oct 7, 2011
Floor votes · Senate Sep 8, 2011 · Assembly Jun 2, 2011

How they voted

248
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 35
Sep 8, 2011
D Democratic23
21 Yea 1 Nay 1
91% Yea
R Republican12
3 Yea 7 Nay 2
58% Nay
Vote distribution
All Yea All Nay Mixed No data
Full legislative history

Actions timeline

Total actions
36
Key actions
8
Committee
12
Amendments
3
Oct 7, 2011
Vetoed
Vetoed by Governor.
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Senate · Passed
Senate Vote: pass (24-8-3)
senate
Sep 8, 2011
Lower · Passed
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 3137.).
lower
Sep 8, 2011
Introduced
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
lower
Sep 6, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
upper
Aug 29, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
upper
Jul 12, 2011
Upper · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (July 6).
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (46-22-4)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 5, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (May 4). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 27, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
lower
Apr 6, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on L. GOV.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 0 co-sponsors

Sponsors

Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
Photo of Richard Pan
Richard Pan
DDemocratic
CA
6