Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009: covered actions.
Summary
Existing law, the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta Reform Act of 2009, establishes the Delta Stewardship Council as an independent agency of the state. Existing law requires a state or local public agency that proposes to take a covered action that will occur within the boundaries of the Delta or the Suisun Marsh to prepare, and submit to the council, a specified written certification of consistency with the Delta Plan prior to taking those actions. Existing law defines a "covered action" to mean a plan, program, or project, as specified. Existing law, the Johnston-Baker-Andal-Boatwright Delta Protection Act of 1992, requires the Delta Protection Commission to review and maintain a comprehensive long-term resource management plan for land uses within the primary zone, as defined, of the Delta. Existing law defines the secondary zone as all the Delta land and water area within the boundaries of the Delta not included within the primary zone, subject to the land use authority of local government, as prescribed. This bill would exclude from the definition of "covered action" any project, as defined, as of September 30, 2009, that is within an urban or urbanizing area within the Delta's secondary zone, within the boundaries of the community's adopted sphere of influence or urban limit line and substantially conforms with an adopted general plan. Existing law, the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a lead agency to prepare and certify the completion of an environmental impact report on a project, as defined, that it proposes to carry out or approve that may have a significant impact on the environment or to adopt a negative declaration if it finds that the project will not have that effect. The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) requires federal agencies to prepare environmental assessments or environmental impact reports that contain statements of the environmental effects of proposed federal agency actions. This bill would exclude from the definition of "covered action" any upgrade to an existing drinking water, stormwater, or wastewater treatment, storage, or conveyance facility within the existing physical footprint or legal property boundaries, as applicable, of the facility, to meet a state or federal water quality compliance order, as specified. This bill would also exclude from the definition of "covered action" any flood control project undertaken within the Delta's secondary zone that is consistent with the Central Valley Flood Protection Act of 2008 and which would provide protection to an urban or urbanizing area or existing public infrastructure. These upgrades and projects would have to comply with CEQA or NEPA, or both.
Bill status
failed
3 of 5 stages cleared
Introduction
Feb 2011
Committee Review
Jun 2012
Assembly Passage
Jun 2011
Senate Passage
Governor
Introduced Feb 18, 2011
Last action Jul 3, 2012
Floor votes · Assembly Jun 2, 2011
How they voted
69–0
Passed · 3 other
Total votes 72
Jun 2, 2011
D
Democratic45
95% Yea
I
Independent1
100% Yea
R
Republican26
96% Yea
Vote distribution
All Yea
All Nay
Mixed
No data
Full legislative history
Actions timeline
Total actions
24
Key actions
5
Committee
10
Amendments
1
Jun 25, 2012
Upper · Passed
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
upper
Jun 14, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
upper
Jun 13, 2012
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
upper
Jun 16, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on E.Q.
upper
Jun 2, 2011
Assembly · Passed
Assembly Vote: pass (69-0-3)
assembly
May 27, 2011
Lower · Passed
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (May 27).
lower
May 18, 2011
Committee
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
lower
May 11, 2011
Lower · Passed
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
lower
May 3, 2011
Committee
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (May 2). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
lower
Apr 4, 2011
Committee
Re-referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Mar 31, 2011
Committee
Referred to Com. on NAT. RES.
lower
Feb 20, 2011
Lower · Passed
From printer. May be heard in committee March 22.
lower
1 primary · 2 co-sponsors
Sponsors
Role
Legislator
Party
State
District
P
JB
Joan Buchanan
DDemocratic
Co
BB
Bill Berryhill
RRepublican
Co
Cathleen Galgiani
DDemocratic
Ask Maddy
·
AI policy assistant
Ask Maddy about AB 1095
Scope: CA
Hi! I can help you understand AB 1095. What would you like to know?
Try one of these
i
Maddy answers using official bill text and legislative records. Always verify before sharing.
Sources cited inline